About JumboTonic

You already know the hard part.

It isn't the model; it's the seam where the model meets the rest of what you already run. This page is about one thing: whether you can trust us with that seam.

Book a Teardown

The Scars

In that world a bad seam doesn't file a bug report.

We spent 20+ years on the healthcare integration layer. HL7, FHIR, HIE; the integrations that consolidate a patient's records into a single source of truth, accessible across the entire health network.

It shows up as a lab result that never reached the doctor. A compliance finding. A handoff that failed silently while everyone downstream assumed it had worked. When the cost of a broken connection is a patient outcome, you stop treating integration as an afterthought and start treating it as the place the real stakes live.

For over ten years of that, we ran enterprise integration at Northwell Health, one of the largest health networks in the country. We worked across all the HIE development teams, managed production platform support, and built frameworks that routed millions of records in real time, the kind that fail loudly and visibly or not at all.

The Difference (Demonstrated)

The path that got us here is a strange one.

We're mirror twins. We started in landscape architecture, took the degrees at Ball State, then went back to the same school for CS Masters and taught graduate CS while we finished. Same firm after that, same jobs, same clients, the whole way: an architecture practice, then Ontario Systems, then J2 Interactive in healthcare consulting, then the integration work above.

That matters for one plain reason. When the person who designs the system and the person who builds it trained on identical material, there is no translation layer between the drawing and the delivery. Nothing gets lost in the handoff, because there is no handoff.

And landscape architecture, it turns out, is closer to system design than it sounds. Both begin with the same questions: how do the separate spaces connect, how do they serve the way people will actually use them, and does the design keep working as that use grows? You start from the owner's goals, translate them into what the design has to do, and organize every part into one clear plan with the intent visible in it. Swap drainage and grade for services and data, and the discipline is identical: a layered whole, designed to hold up under load, years later, when no one is watching. That lens is what we bring to every integration.

Jerry and Jeff Shields

Jerry Shields

Co-Founder & Chief Architect

Design and architecture lead. Writes at systemsintel.dev.

Jeff Shields

Co-Founder & Chief Engineer

Technical delivery lead.

How We Operate

Our standard is short, and it is the whole trust argument: we're finished when your team can run the system without us.

No black box you can't open. Your infrastructure, your control; you own what we build. We would rather you never need a second call than bill you for one.

Next Step

If you want to see how we think before you commit to anything, book a Teardown.

We map where your systems meet, tell you where the seams are weak, and hand you the findings. You keep them whether or not we ever work together.

Book a Teardown

Prefer to read us first? Jerry writes at Systems Intelligence (systemsintel.dev) about how these systems actually fit together. That's the thinking behind the work; read it before you ever hire us.